#1 TikTok Ads Spy Tool

A Better Way to Make TikTok Ads Dropshipping & TikTok For Business

  • Find TikTok winning products & TikTok dropshipping ads.
  • Analyze TikTok advertisers
  • Get the Latest TikTok Shop Data.
Try It Free

shopify trump president support for violence

Published on: January 28 2023 by pipiads

In this article, we will be discussing the recent controversy surrounding Shopify's decision to remove Donald Trump's store from their platform. We will be examining the hypocrisy of this decision and comparing it to the fact that other controversial groups such as the Latin Kings, Bloods, Crips, and Black Lives Matter continue to have stores on the platform.

Shopify's Hypocrisy:

Shopify has recently stated that they do not tolerate actions that incite violence and have determined that Donald Trump's actions violate their acceptable use policy. However, this decision seems hypocritical when compared to the fact that other controversial groups such as the Latin Kings, Bloods, Crips, and Black Lives Matter continue to have stores on the platform.

- Shopify's CEO previously stated that commerce is a form of expression and they would not make moral judgments on who is selling or what they are selling, as long as it is legal.

- Shopify has deviated from this stance by removing Donald Trump's store from the platform.

- Black Lives Matter engaged in a lot of violence over the summer, yet they continue to have a Shopify store.

- Latin Kings, Bloods, and Crips have stores on Shopify despite being known for their violent activities.

Personal Bias:

The author of this article claims to have no personal bias in this issue and identifies as a libertarian. They state that they try to be intellectually honest and consistent in their views.

- The author does not support either the Republican or Democratic party and has their own views.

- They acknowledge that everyone has biases and tend to be hypocritical at times.

- The author believes in judging everyone by the same standards and holding them to the same merit.

In conclusion, Shopify's decision to remove Donald Trump's store from their platform seems hypocritical when compared to the fact that other controversial groups continue to have stores on the platform. The author of this article claims to have no personal bias in this issue and believes in judging everyone by the same standards. While there are arguments to be made for and against the different groups on the platform, it is important to examine and address this issue of hypocrisy.

Facebook, Instagram ban Donald Trump indefinitely after supporters storm U.S. Capitol

Mark Zuckerberg Blocks President Trump on Facebook and Instagram

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, has made a dramatic move by announcing that President Trump will be blocked from using Facebook and Instagram indefinitely due to the risks posed by allowing him to continue using these platforms.

Sub-Headings:

- Zuckerberg's Previous Stance on Free Speech

- The Extension of the 24-Hour Block

- Facebook's Move to Prevent Bad Use of the Platform

- Revisiting Facebook's Policy on Credible News

- The Shift in Facebook's Position on Free Speech

Zuckerberg's Previous Stance on Free Speech:

Mark Zuckerberg has always been an advocate for free speech on Facebook and has called for regulation to create guidelines for limiting speech on the platform. However, this recent move to block President Trump shows a significant shift in Zuckerberg's position.

The Extension of the 24-Hour Block:

Facebook had previously put a 24-hour block on President Trump, but this has now been extended indefinitely. This bold move by Zuckerberg and Facebook comes amid criticisms that the platform has been enabling the organization of violent events, such as the recent attack on the Capitol.

Facebook's Move to Prevent Bad Use of the Platform:

Facebook has been facing a lot of criticism for not being quick enough to take down harmful content from the platform. This has led to questions about whether Facebook is biased in how it regulates content and whether it can be used as a tool for bad. Zuckerberg and Facebook have now decided that the risk is too great to allow President Trump to use the platform.

Revisiting Facebook's Policy on Credible News:

Facebook had previously been elevating more credible news content into people's news feeds before apparently stopping this policy. With this recent move to block President Trump, there are questions about whether Facebook will revisit this policy and make it permanent.

The Shift in Facebook's Position on Free Speech:

For many years, Zuckerberg had believed that people needed to know what the president was saying, even if it was controversial or incendiary. However, with the recent events at the Capitol, Facebook has shifted its position and now sees the use of the platform to incite violent insurrection as a fundamental difference in context.

Facebook's decision to block President Trump on its platforms is a significant move and highlights the growing concerns about the role social media platforms play in inciting violence. While Zuckerberg has previously advocated for free speech, this move shows that he and Facebook now see the risks posed by allowing harmful content on their platform as too great.

January 6 committee refers criminal charges against Donald Trump- BBC News

- Subcommittee tasked with bringing recommendations about potential referrals to Department of Justice and other authorities based on evidence of criminal and civil offenses related to the January 6th assault on American democracy

- Subcommittee prepared to share recommendations today

Background considerations for criminal referrals:

- Hundreds of individual criminal offenses already being prosecuted by Department of Justice

- Subcommittee proposes advancing referrals where gravity of offense, severity of harm, and centrality of offender to unlawful scheme to overthrow election compel action

- System of justice should not allow foot soldiers to go to jail while masterminds and ringleaders get a free pass

- Subcommittee presented evidence to federal judge in Eastman case last spring, who concluded former President Trump and John Eastman likely violated two federal criminal statutes

Criminal referrals:

1. Title 18 section 1512 C: unlawful for anyone to corruptly obstruct, influence, or impede any official proceeding of the United States government

- Evidence warrants criminal referral of former President Trump, John Eastman, and others for violating this statute

- Trump's scheme designed to obstruct, influence, and impede official proceeding for lawful transfer of power in the United States

2. Title 18 section 371: crime to conspire to defraud the United States, impair, obstruct, or defeat lawful functions of US government by deceitful or dishonest means

- Evidence warrants criminal referral of former President Trump, John Eastman, and others for violating this statute

- Trump entered into agreements formal and informal with several other individuals who assisted him with his criminal objectives

3. Title 18 section 1001: unlawful to knowingly and willfully make materially false statements to federal government

- Evidence warrants criminal referral of former President Trump and others for submitting slates of fake electors to Congress and National Archives

4. Title 18 section 2383: applies to anyone who incites, assists, or engages in insurrection against the United States of America and anyone who gives aid or comfort to an insurrection

- Evidence warrants criminal referral of former President Trump for assisting or aiding and comforting those at the Capitol who engaged in a violent attack on the United States

- President Trump intended to disrupt peaceful transfer of power under the Constitution

- Committee developed significant evidence that President Trump intended to disrupt peaceful transfer of power under the Constitution

Other potential criminal violations:

- Depending on evidence developed by Department of Justice, President Trump's actions could trigger other criminal violations

- Subcommittee asked multiple members of Congress to speak with them about issues critical to understanding attack on the 2020 election and system of constitutional democracy, but none agreed to provide essential information

- Subcommittee issued subpoenas to members who possessed information about President Trump's plans to overturn the election, but none complied

- Referring four members of Congress for appropriate sanction by the House Ethics Committee for failure to comply with lawful subpoenas

- Subcommittee understands gravity of each referral being made today

- Subcommittee went where facts and law lead, which inevitably led to these criminal referrals

- Crime against democracy described in report is of great magnitude

Your Missing The SCARIEST Thing About Trumps Banning From Twitter, Facebook, Shopify & More

The recent deplatforming of Donald Trump by major Silicon Valley companies has led to a major power grab, one that has gone unchallenged. While many people are reacting emotionally to this event, it is important to recognize the danger of this move and its implications for free speech and competition.

Main points:

- The deplatforming of Donald Trump is a red herring, the real danger is the power grab by Silicon Valley companies.

- The move to deplatform Trump was coordinated and unchallenged.

- Trump's banning was convenient for Silicon Valley companies as it prevented competition.

- The move to deplatform Trump is the single greatest power grab in history.

- The move to deplatform Trump is dangerous and sets a precedent for future censorship.

- The monopolistic move by Silicon Valley is a cause for concern.

- Amazon workers are now demanding Parler be removed from Amazon's web hosting service.

- Parler needs to find a way to stay on the platform and not miss out on the opportunity.

- Biden is unlikely to push back against this move and it could lead to years of censorship.

The move to deplatform Donald Trump is not just a partisan issue, it is a dangerous move that sets a precedent for future censorship. Silicon Valley companies have made a power grab that needs to be challenged. It is important for people to recognize the danger of this move and not let partisanship blind them to the bigger picture. Parler needs to find a way to stay on the platform and not miss out on the opportunity. Biden's presidency could lead to years of censorship and it is important to remain vigilant.

January 6 committee approves DOJ criminal referrals for Donald Trump

Canadian police report a shooting that killed five people in a Toronto suburb. Meanwhile, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried is expected to agree to extradition to the US. The holiday season is in full swing, with last-minute shoppers rushing to get their gifts delivered on time. Lastly, Argentina wins the 2022 World Cup following a thrilling match against France.

Facts:

- Five people were killed in a shooting in a Toronto suburb, and the gunman was killed by police. One other person is expected to survive.

- Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried is expected to agree to extradition to the US after being denied bail and facing eight counts of criminal fraud and charges from the SEC.

- Today is the last day to send gifts via priority mail to ensure they arrive in time for Christmas.

- Argentina won the 2022 World Cup in a penalty shootout against France, with Lionel Messi leading the team to victory.

The holiday season brings both joy and tragedy, as we see the aftermath of a shooting in Canada and the excitement of the World Cup. Meanwhile, the legal system continues to pursue justice, as Sam Bankman-Fried faces extradition and the January 6 committee recommends criminal charges against former President Trump. As we enter the new year, we must continue to stay informed and engaged with the world around us.

Video #4157 - Donald Trump Being Banned On Social Media - My Thoughts, Why I Got Banned On Facebook?

Donald Trump's suspension from social media platforms: a breakdown of the situation and its implications

- Donald Trump's suspension from various social media platforms has sparked controversy and debate regarding freedom of speech and censorship.

Main Points:

- Two sides to the argument: those who believe it is a clampdown on freedom of speech and those who believe it is necessary to prevent harmful or dangerous content.

- Comparison of treatment of white protestors versus Black Lives Matter protestors.

- Donald Trump's immense power and responsibility as the President of the United States.

- Recklessness and lack of responsibility in his communication with supporters, leading to dangerous and harmful consequences.

- Personal experience with online harassment and the potential for harm that comes with a large following.

- Mistakes made by Trump in his handling of the situation, including poor communication and failure to take responsibility.

- Donald Trump's suspension from social media platforms is a complex issue with arguments on both sides.

- However, his recklessness and lack of responsibility in his communication with supporters ultimately led to harm and damage.

- It is important to recognize the potential harm that can come from a large following and the need for responsible communication from those in positions of power.

Facebook Is Clearly Lined Up on Team Trump, Says Roger McNamee

In a recent interview, Roger McNamee, a prominent tech investor and critic of Facebook, spoke about the company's business model and its impact on society. He expressed concerns about the use of algorithms to grab users' attention and amplify harmful content, such as hate speech, disinformation, and conspiracy theories. He also discussed the role of Facebook in the upcoming US election and its alignment with President Trump.

Key Points:

- Facebook's business model is based on monopolizing users' attention and provoking their emotions.

- Algorithms are used to amplify harmful content, which is a serious issue for society.

- Facebook has altered its Terms of Service to protect the privileges of the president for advertising in the campaign, making it vulnerable.

- If President Trump wins the election, Facebook will be seen as an even-handed player in the electoral process.

- If Biden wins, he will treat Facebook fairly and recognize the harm caused by its business model.

- The rise of the quarantine resistance movement was organized and executed on social media platforms, causing harm to society.

- Investors are in an awkward place because the market is telling them everything is fine, but civil unrest may change the culture for corporations.

- Facebook should have taken action against the president's tweet suggesting that looters be shot, like Twitter did.

- Roger McNamee called for changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and national legislation to give users the right to sue for damages if they are harmed as a result.

Roger McNamee's interview highlights the serious concerns about Facebook's business model and its impact on society. The company's alignment with President Trump and its alteration of Terms of Service have made it vulnerable in the upcoming US election. If changes are not made to Section 230 and national legislation, the harmful content will continue to be amplified, causing more harm to society.

Start your free trial today!

Try Pipiads free for trial, no credit card required. By entering your email,
You will be taken to the signup page.